College of Arts & Sciences: Cybersecurity
· Use the Computers & Applied Science database
· Locate the articles: “The Case for Banning Killer Robots: Point” by Stephen Goose and “The Case for Banning Killer Robots: Counterpoint” by Ronald Arkin
Carefully review the details below, along with the Synthesis Paper assessment details and preparation checklist
The general instructions for your synthesis paper are as follows:
· Write a 500-600-word critical review of the above articles · The first portion of your review should consist of a summary of the authors’ arguments and the way they support their arguments. In other words, what are the authors’ main points, or theses? What are the means by which the authors support these theses? Look at the author’s points of evidence, organization, and overall method for presenting this information
The first portion of your review should consist of a summary of the authors’ argument and a discussion of their methodology (i.e., how they approach and organize their argument). In other words, what is the author’s main point, or thesis? What are the means by which the author supports this thesis? Look at the author’s points of evidence, organization, and overall method for presenting this information.
The second portion of the review should consist of your analysis and evaluation of their argument (*Do not begin to analyze and evaluate until you have first summarized their argument and noted their methodology*). Did the author effectively communicate his/her thesis? Why or why not? You will not be required to include outside sources for this portion of the paper, but you can if you wish.
It is essential that you apply each facet of what you have learned so far in this course: proper grammar, avoiding plagiarism, clarity and concision, and proper formatting and citation (according to your school’s style guide). This assignment will be graded on the basis of how well you’ve synthesized each facet of learning from this course.
The review must, therefore, demonstrate the same mastery of (a) grammar/punctuation acquired in Weeks 1-2, of (b) avoiding plagiarism acquired in Week 3, of (c) concision and clarity acquired in Weeks 4-5, and of (d) proper discipline-specific citation and formatting acquired in Week 6.
Take note of the rubric provided for this critical review assessment.
NOTE: Turabian papers do NOT require a Table of Contents, and APA papers do NOT require an abstract.
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.Read more
The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.Read more
The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.Read more
By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.Read more