Physician profiling is a collection of provider-specific and practice-level data used to analyze physician practice patterns, utilization of services, and outcomes of care. Physician report cards (which may be a component of a physician profile) compare physicians on outcomes related to measures such as quality, patient satisfaction, and cost-utilization patterns.
In this Discussion, you will identify three strategies for improving physician quality practice ranking on physician profiling and quality report cards. Be sure to justify your recommendations.
To prepare:
Review the Learning Resources as they relate to quality-improvement assessment and health care quality outcomes
Post a cohesive response to the following:
Post an analysis of physician quality practice data. Then, recommend three strategies for improving physician quality practice rankings on physician profiling and quality report cards. Justify your recommendations with references to your Learning Resources or other academic resources.
Support your response by identifying and explaining key points and/or examples presented in the Learning Resources.
Resources:
Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2014). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Chapter 7, “Physician and Provider Profiling” (pp. 175–190)
Chapter 9, “Measuring and Improving Patient Experiences of Care” (pp. 209–239)
Byrnes, J. (2014). Using the board quality committee to drive the value proposition. Healthcare Financial Management, 68(8), 92–93.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Payne, J., & Leiter, J. (2013). Structuring agency: Examining healthcare management in the USA and Australia using organizational theory. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27(1), 106–112.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
ACC/AHA/AACVPR/AAFP/ANA Concepts for clinician — Patient shared accountability in performance measures: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on performance measures by Peterson, E. D., Ho, P. M., Barton, M., Beam, C., Burgess, L.H., Casey, D. E., Jr.,… Stanko, S. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64(20), 2133–2145. Copyright 2014 by Elsevier Health Science Journals. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier Health Science Journals via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Professional pointers. (2015). Healthcare Executive, 30(1), 48–49.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreThe Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.
Read moreThe Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.
Read moreThe Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.
Read moreBy placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.
Read more